Web Toolbar by Wibiya

Does Charlaine still like Eric?

For all general discussion of our favorite Viking/Sheriff/Entrepreneur.

Moderator: Alexa

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby Aaine » Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:34 am

I was also pretty aghast when I first heard this interview but after thinking about it some more I have calmed somewhat ;)

First of all, I do think that her response to DeeDee's question - basically stating that everyone is blinded to Eric's character faults because he's good in bed - was totally insulting not just to DeeDee but to everyone who has invested in this character because of his complexity, and the way Harris herself has painstakingly developed him over the years. I don't know what the hell she thought she was going to achieve by saying something like that.

Regarding the Eric is BAD comments. Here's the timeline:

Day 1 - Ball came out at Paley and dropped the Bill Bomb
Day 2 - Charlaine made a public comment on her website trying to contain the damage and calm down her rabidly pro Bill forum. She also made a separate comment about Eric that again referred to some of her readers not being able to see past his sexual nature, and said that he was bad but no worse than any other vampire.
Day 3 - The BlogTalk radio interview was given in which the Bad Bad Boy statement was made - reiterating again what she'd said the day before but without the qualification (that he’s no worse than others).

I think it was pretty obvious what she is doing. Ball's confirmation that she had considered killing Bill was basically the death knell for Bill as the HEA. Everyone knows that CH has known since the start of the series who the HEA is and she hasn't changed her mind - so if she even considered offing Bill in Book 9 then it can't be him.

While many readers suspected this was her original intention in DAG, having it confirmed alienates a large proportion of her fanbase and risks a considerable number of them completely losing interest.

So...what's the best way to stop them giving up on the series altogether and contain some of the damage?

You come out kicking the other guy. Bring him down a few notches. Make it look like he is not a shoo-in either. Get his fanbase all riled up thinking perhaps the author doesn’t really like him - so that they aren't so cocky about their man winning even with the other guy out. Think about it - in the 24 hours between Ball’s Big Mouth, and her coming out kicking Eric, the gloating had already started by Eric fans on many of the boards I read. She had to contain that and bring everyone back to where she wants them - not having a freaking clue what she's going to do. And she’s done that pretty successfully because I’m suddenly hearing a lot of people talking about Sam again lately – and isn’t he always the fallback position? ;)

Well, maybe she is just preparing the field. Because no matter how I love Eric I actually do not think Charlaine means for Sookie to end up with him. I think she is going to develop a new character for her. The point is she has to do that character stronger and more interesting than Eric so she wouldn´t loose her readers and that would be very difficult.

Introducing a new suitor this late in the game would be suicide for this series. Not only would she lose the Eric fans – the majority of whom at this point I think would burn their books before they would see Sookie with some ring-in new guy – but also everyone else. Bill, Sam and Quinn fans (is there anyone still rooting for Alcide LOL) are also just as committed and I don’t see that she will get too many people on board with a new suitor now. No matter how well she writes him.
Sookieverse Blog

"Darling, you can nail my ass anytime".
Eric to Sookie, Dead & Gone
User avatar
Aaine
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:34 pm

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby dearheart » Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:56 am

Perfect reasoning,Aaine.I agree with you completely.

KISSES
User avatar
dearheart
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:21 am

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby gigi » Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:57 am

I really don't know if she was just trying to throw people off (only she knows) but IMO it wasn't. I visit her forum often enough to percieive the changes in her attitude to answer Eric's fans. So I want to address some points.

First, we had her public statement (obviously for Bill's fans) regarding AB's manipulative comments about her toughts of killing him.
6941 duckpond100 2009-10-29 18:31
I understand that Alan was commenting on the differences between the future of the series and the plot of the books at Paleyfest, and remarked that I'd been "talked out of" killing Bill. That's leaving an inaccurate impression with many readers, my moderators have told me.

Unfortunately, in a conversation with Alan some months ago I did tell him that when I was finishing DEAD AND GONE I did consider the possibility that Bill might die in the fairy assault on the field hospital. I did not realize that Alan might remember and repeat my words. During the course of the Sookie series, I've considered killing off several characters who haven't bitten the dust yet and may never. That's one of the choices a fiction writer considers with every book. And you'll notice that in the end, I decided that Bill had more story to tell.

So please don't give Alan's words any more weight than they're due, or blow them out of proportion. It never occurred to me that he might repeat a casual remark of mine about a possibility that never came to pass.

Charlaine Harris

If she was worry enough to made a statement about it (notice she also used the word unfortunately) is because she knew he was trying to manipulate TB Bill's fans and it will affect her future books selling. IMO it was a shame he used a sneaky comment like that, but at the end is her own fault because she sold him the rights to "destroy" all her work, make with it whatever he wants, and NOW he is even manipulating fans to push his ideas on her future work. She could have been wiser and negotiate a deal to mantain at least the plot line and the character's integrity (the inner spirit of her work and the WHOLE reason of her bestseller's success), but maybe he made an offer she couldn't resist, and now he is using it against her to achieve what he wants. Because if, like she said, his words don't have more weight than they're due, certainly she didn't have the need to worry making a public statement about them either or say her conversation with AB was unfortunate...

I found this interesting exchange regarding the "BAD" interview:
1888 duckpond100 Edited 2009-11-04 09:26 2009-11-04 08:23
Hermione, a legitimate point. Of course I don't know why you are fond of Eric, you specifically. I do run into a lot of fans who are obsessed with him sexually and see him as a great guy; they completely ignore his darker, murderous side. I'm not saying that other vampires are squeaky clean. I'm saying that Eric isn't all sweetness and light and great sex. He's not particularly bad, but he's a vampire and he enjoys that power to the fullest.

I'm addressing Hermione's remarks publicly because she's not the first reader I've heard from. She felt I was picking on Eric when I remarked in an interview that some readers are more interested in whether Sookie and Eric will have sex than in any other aspect of the books.

I'm constantly amazed that my characters are the object of so much thought! It's amazing and confounding.

Charlaine Harris

She was answering a pm from a forum member. The member explained to her after this answer that she asked via pm because didn't want people to make an issue about it, (but later posted her original pm so everybody could read it, too):
Dear Ms Harris,

I would like to tell you something that isn't exactly a compliment, but I do so with the outmost respect for yourself and your work. I read a bit of an interview where you said that you think all the people interested in Eric are only dying to know if he and Sookie will have sex, because they do not think about his character at all and ignore his being a bad boy. Forgive me, Ms Harris, how is Eric more of a bad boy than-say-Bill is? Or any other vamp? I for one like him because he is witty, and fun, he has humour, and joie de vivre, he is loyal towards his child, decent towards his employees, he doesn't lie, you know where you stand with him, and because he respects Sookie as a person, he recognizes her strenght and working skills. If I-along with the majority of your readers-am missing something, please, enlighten me. I do not see him as the bad boy in this series, because, as you yourself said, all your characters are both good and bad, so singling him out as the particularly bad one seems hardly fair, don't you think?

Best Regards,

Hermione82

There she said that "some people" (at the interview she said "all")... Anyway, if you read both, Q&A, you can tell her answer was really lame. Why? The lady who asked her EXPLAINED (to the detail) WHY she likes Eric and CH answerd she didn't know why she is fond of him... Did she really read it before answering?? Or could be possible that she thought she could discard the question with that kind of answer because it was a pm and never thought anyone else could read it? If there's no difference between vampires, why don't be wiser and answer something fair enough like "Eric is as bad as Bill" in order to mantain a balance between her fans?

IMO, this is a public mockery about Eric's fans:
I'm addressing Hermione's remarks publicly because she's not the first reader I've heard from. She felt I was picking on Eric when I remarked in an interview that some readers are more interested in whether Sookie and Eric will have sex than in any other aspect of the books.

I'm constantly amazed that my characters are the object of so much thought! It's amazing and confounding.

If it isn't a public mockery, then why we never read from her an answer like that to Bill's death concerned fans? Maybe she never thought the lady would make public her pm...

I also found that someone answered this to ericslady after she let us know in this thread what happened when she asked CH there:
6988 whoknowswhy99 2009-11-07 07:35
Ericslady, I believe this is the post cbe was referring to from a couple of days ago:

7106 nurse_amy 2009-11-04 23:18
Charlaine your interview for Dr blog has started a firestorm on the Eric thread. lol

Could you explain, do you think Eric is bad or evil. am i reading him wrong in the books because i see him as an anti-hero. i see him bad (murder people in past etc) but who has good qualities in him. and hopefully love for sookie (i know you can't answer that one).

i am just wondering if i am reading him wrong. i feel that you created such an amazing multilevel character. but i do not see him a BAD or evil.

thanks Amy

7107 duckpond100 2009-11-05 07:13
Amy, I'm not going to discuss it any more. If I talk about the books, I don't write them. It's as wrong for me to second guess my readers as it is for my readers to second guess me.

***edited for unrelated information***

Charlaine Harris

English isn't my first language (so please also excuse any mistake in my writing, too lol), but even it isn't, this answer (IMO) was kind of rude. Also, isn't she also second guessing her readers about why they like Eric? For me as her fan and her reader is insulting that she insists in answering that Eric's fans are more interested in whether S&E will have sex. Especially because if any of you go to her forum and read the Bill Comptom's thread and archives, you will also find hundreds of readers asking if B&S will have hot steamy sex in DITF or commenting her past books sex scenes. So, how are Eric's fans different from Bill's NOW? Which is the difference she sees between them NOW? Why just use this kind of lame argument in her interviews and when answering HER Eric fans? Why suddenly Bill is untouchable and his fans deserves a public explanation from her while Eric's fans are now categorized by her as silly and clueless women interested only in his sexual exchanges with Sookie and deserves her public mockery?

I agree with you in a lot of points Aaine, but still are better ways to keep a balance between fans and not hurt or insult the ones supporting your books and work for so long. It's enough frustraiting for us HER fans (who were so excited for having at last the opportunity to watch on TV her SVM series) to have now a moron and codependent Sookie, a St. Bill Hero who screams "SUKUUUU" every 3 words, an almost invisible Pam, a (in own AB's words) totally crazy and vain Sophie Ann, and a BAD villain and drug dealer Eric... and also have to be insulted by her.
Image

‘Oh, Billy…This paranoia, it’s really quite unbecoming. Has she, uh…mentioned me?’
User avatar
gigi
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:41 pm

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby Aaine » Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:38 pm

Thanks for posting that stuff from her website gigi - my post was getting too long, but the comments she made to Hermione were the ones I was referencing as well.

7107 duckpond100 2009-11-05 07:13
Amy, I'm not going to discuss it any more. If I talk about the books, I don't write them. It's as wrong for me to second guess my readers as it is for my readers to second guess me.

***edited for unrelated information***

Charlaine Harris


See, this. THIS is the problem and this is what I wish she would just STOP.

She gets on her forum and she makes these vague, open ended, non commital comments about plot and and characters in response to often *very* specific questions from her readers. Because her comments are so vague and open-ended, they are easily twisted and often misinterpreted by her readers in support of whatever point they are trying to push.

So a shit-fight ensues, then she comes back on and says she's not commenting anymore because the books speak for themselves (she has said this before and alluded to it again above).

OK - then with all due respect, just shut up and LET the damn books speak.

While I admire her engaging with her fans via her forum, she either needs to say "OK I'm going to answer questions more directly" - or if she can't/is not prepared to do that, then don't answer them at all. Leave it to the reader to draw their own conclusions from the canon of the books. Which would absolutely be my preference.

I know for myself, that if I were to base my feelings about Sookie's HEA on absolutely NOTHING except canon - what Harris has put on the page in black and white - I would have no doubt where this story was logically leading. It's all the stuff she says and does off page that cause me to second guess (but I don't do that often because my case is now pretty strong lol)

I don't know who manages her PR but she should fire them asap. She is getting very bad advice from somewhere.

Going one on one with your readers in a forum is fine when you have a small following - now it's a recipe for disaster. She needs to step away from that forum and just tell us what we need to know about the characters and the plot in the goddamn books.

And if we need to know that Eric is BAD bad BAD - then write him that way.

Until she does that, whatever comes out of her mouth that doesn't mesh with what she has put on the page can only be deliberate manipulation of the reader.

I agree with you in a lot of points Aaine, but still are better ways to keep a balance between fans and not hurt or insult the ones supporting your books and work for so long. It's enough frustraiting for us HER fans (who were so excited for having at last the opportunity to watch on TV her SVM series) to have now a moron and codependent Sookie, a St. Bill Hero who screams "SUKUUUU" every 3 words, an almost invisible Pam, a (in own AB's words) totally crazy and vain Sophie Ann, and a BAD villain and drug dealer Eric... and also have to be insulted by her.

Oh I hear you hon. I am incredibily disappointed with what has gone down. As if book Eric fans aren't being manipulated enough by Alan Ball, now we have CH doing it as well.

And I HATE being manipulated.
Sookieverse Blog

"Darling, you can nail my ass anytime".
Eric to Sookie, Dead & Gone
User avatar
Aaine
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:34 pm

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby cathrine » Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:34 pm

I hate beeing manipulated too.I think the worst thing that could happend when a show or a movie is based on the books the producer or the author not to understand the chracters.I got enough of AB ''Sookie and Bill are epic love'' and ''Eric can't love anyone but himself''to understand that he doesn't understand the charcter and I don't understand why he started doing this show when he doesn't understand one of the main characters.I still think that it's insultung for Eric and ES fans giving Eric part to Bill,having so little Eric screen time and everytime he sees a key moment,an important moment between ES he tottally destroys them.Examples:Bill not Eric staking LongShadow,Sookie beeing disgusted from Eric(I think form the start she was afraid from him but i don't think he disgusted her),Bill beeing there to help Sookie and not showing Sookie beeing at the hospital and Eric sending her flowers and looking at her,Eric calling Lorena,Eric telling saint Beel to go after the humans when in the books Beel goes himsel whitout Eric telling him anything and leaves Sookie alone whitout even seeing is she is okay, the bullet-sucking scene that was destroyed by making Bill a saint and Eric a villain again and than AB having the chance to make the orgy scene (I'm not sure this scene would have worked though)but no he choose Eric to have less screen time, Saint Bill to be the hero again and prorposing to Sookie ,beeing kidnaped and her screaming ''Beel'',oh yes I would have forgot Beel sending Sookie a dress (a thing Eric would do)and proposing to her(a thing that Eric sort of did in the 4th book).And AB even said beofre the start of season 1 I think that he KNEW how popular Eric was and that he was the most important chratcer in the novels but yet he chooses to do this whit his chratcer.I'm not saying that I didn't like some moments between ES.Timebomb and I Will raise Up were great episodes both for Eric and ES(on a side not isn't anyoneelse angry that when Beel punched Eric at the most vulnrebale moment of his life Sookie just stand there and didn't even say something.Seriously!Seriously!Book Sookie would have said something about this I'm sure.Eventhough she was naive in the books she never let herself beeing control by Beel.Something I can't say about TV Sookie) but that isn't enought to stop my anger at how AB has fucked up Eric's character.But hearing and the aurtor say eric is a bad boy I'm sorry you didn't write him as a ruthless killer so please don't start saying he is bad because he isn't.Yes he maybe is a sexual creature and yes he loves power but how many times had put his status as a sheriff in danger because if I remeber he saved in the 7th book,and he saved Sookie in the 9th book again.Ofcourse you can say he did it because he wants to use her but we know this isn't true.But really I shouldn't be surpised that CH said that because she also said she didn't know if Eric was in love whit Sookie but she wrote him as beeing in love whit Sookie. :evil:
cathrine
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:23 pm

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby dearheart » Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:43 pm

Aaine,you are soo my woman :smitten:

Regarding Ms.Harries role in her own forum,I just can't help but think about J.R.Ward.The way she solves this kind of things is with a big KEEP READING....see,no problems at all. :toast:
Wish she would figure it out.She can't expect to make all of her readers happy throwing them some crumbs and not pretend it to get out of hand sooner or later.
As some have stated,it would be safer for her peace of mind to not comment again,except when/if it's time to share some detail/spoiler to get us hyped.
But,obviously,she has the right to do as she please.

KISSES
User avatar
dearheart
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:21 am

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby bontempstired » Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:40 am

My issue isn't really about the show or even necessarily Bill vs. Eric. I think that Bill and Eric fans going at eachothers throats is pointless. My problem is with the idea that vampires are inherently "evil" or not good enough to be a life partner for sookie. I feel that we weren't supposed to think of eric (or bill) as viable long term options for sookie. From my reading of the books, vampires are just as complex and capable of 'good' and 'evil' as other supes and humans. I don't doubt that eric is flawed, but to infer that he (or other vamps) aren't capable of growth, especially now that they're out and actually have more options available to them bothers me.
bontempstired
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 9:50 pm

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby midnight_charm » Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:00 pm

Many of you know I haven't read the books, but I do have a theory on why AB and CH are constantly making derogatory remarks about Eric, and insulting his fans in the process, while constantly propping up Bill.

I've come to the conclusion that Alan Ball is portraying Bill as a brilliant, murderous sociopath who has everybody fooled, including the audience. There are many clues to this and many subtle and not so subtle, or ambiguous and not so ambiguous, details of the Bill character on TB that point me in this direction. I lay out my theories mostly in this thread at TB Wiki:

http://truebloodwiki.hbo.com/thread/341 ... Results=20

Until about page 122 when I was essentially told to shut up.

Anyway, here is my point. I think CH must undoubtedly know what direction AB is taking Bill and is assisting him in his "propaganda" campaign. They want the reveal of Bill's true character to be a deep shock to the audience, but once it is revealed the details and clues I mentioned will assure everyone it didn't come out of left field, and in fact many people will wonder why they made so many excuses for Bill, why they pulled out every justification in the book (so to speak) in a desperate effort to justify his actions.

AB is trying to make a point about watching what people do rather than listening to what they say or relying on how they SEEM to make character judgements--and this applies to Eric as much as Bill. CH is apparently onboard with his plans or she wouldn't back him up so much. The comment from Ball about CH killing Bill off was just a snafu. Ball got overanxious to sustain the impression that HIS Bill was a worthy "good" character whom he intends to keep around while as we all know CH's Bill is not really an integral factor in SVM, so he didn't think the comment would cause as much angst as it did.

Eric fans WILL be vindicated in the end on TB, trust me. :viking:
midnight_charm
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 2:44 am

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby Shellee » Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:41 pm

When this hit tumblr, there were quite a few, uhm, comments about it as well.
But didn't CH say before that Eric is like her fave character because he's NOT just a bad guy, that there's more to him? I think she's trying to throw us off, but I do believe that in four more books to come, we are going to see a bad light on Eric. It will get a bit boring if we keep seeing Eric getting "better" when he has already gotten high up the list in book nine. So yeah. I hope she's just humouring AB and throwing us off, or I'll be very pissed and sad!
User avatar
Shellee
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:51 pm
Location: on my sofa

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby Shellee » Sat Nov 14, 2009 4:47 pm

I just read through all the comments, and my headache came on again because of it.
Anyways, what does HEA mean?
And I'd like to point out that CH basically said that Sookie will not end up with the life that she wants - meaning a husband, good marriage and children. Which to me means that she won't end up with a human at all. I very much doubt that Sam will be the one she ends up with in the end, because there is hardly any, uhm, well, chemistry like that. I mean, yeah, there are a few where she thinks about him and blabla, but to me, that's not enough to build an entire relationship, nevermind a marriage on.
I still believe that we'll get to see some bad sides of Eric still, before the series have ended, and the only way I can see the series end is Sookie and Eric together, or Eric is dead. Then again, CH did say before that both Eric and Sookie survive the series. And CH was SILLY to tell AB about Bill, because now she is letting people influence her books, which she shouldn't allow at all!
And yes, she should stop being so rude to her fans, and commenting all together.
User avatar
Shellee
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:51 pm
Location: on my sofa

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby Aaine » Mon Nov 16, 2009 2:31 am

I agree with most of what you said Shellee - especially the Sam part. I SO don't feel it and it's not just because I want her with Eric. I just don't feel the chemistry there at all, from either of them.

HEA = Happy Ever After
Sookieverse Blog

"Darling, you can nail my ass anytime".
Eric to Sookie, Dead & Gone
User avatar
Aaine
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:34 pm

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby Team Eric » Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:12 pm

I am hopping she is just trying to throw us all off. I think Eric is perfect for Sookie and it upsets me when CH talks about Eric. Bill did a lot of bad things to Sookie and she isnt blaming him for anything.
User avatar
Team Eric
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:06 pm

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby Kogo Shuko » Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:19 pm

Let's face it: Eric really is a bad guy. He is evil, and he has killed, moreso than Bill. And why? Because he's had hundreds of years more to do it, and to excel at it! I don't for a minute doubt that Eric used to be a ruthless killer, and that he enjoyed the lifestyle.

And let's not forget what he was before he became vampire. Eric had been a viking. I think they're cool, but did you know that they killed off an entire people? The Picts were annihilated by the Vikings. The reason I so chose to learn that tidbit is because the Scottish clan I come from claims to be descended from the Picts (but other clans scoff at this remark). For one people to kill off another people entirely - and on purpose, for this was no killing by disease - that's pretty harsh, cruel, and let's face it... evil.

And while I am most undoubtedly in love with the character of Eric Northman, I can see where she's coming from. Especially since I am choosing to ignore Eric's past. I choose to love the character who comes from a bloodthirsty background - even before he became human! Bill, while still a vampire, has a more... noble... human past, although I suppose the slavery thing sure as hell isn't noble. But basically... Bill didn't go around pillaging. Eric most probably did.

We, the readers, do so choose to ignore Eric's past. But we choose to ignore it so that we can see the Eric in the here and now. And even the present Eric isn't all rainbows and puppies. I do agree with the statement that Eric can't love anyone but himself. He really couldn't. Not until he met Sookie, that is. Sookie has changed him, and it's the changed man that I have come to love. I think there's a lot of change going on in Eric's life, and Sookie is allowing him to become the man he has been underneath the facade. Whether it was a facade or not, I still think he has been a cruel and heartless bastard. And I think he will be again. But if he does something, I have no doubt he will try to earn Sookie's trust and respect once more, and he shall. Because Sookie is what makes him tic now. He needs to feel the emotions she instills upon him.
With my hands,
I give you my heart,
And crown it with my love.

Image
User avatar
Kogo Shuko
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Canada, eh

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby bontempstired » Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:17 pm

Actually, from what we know while he was human eric seems to have lived pretty close to the honor code he grew up with, and that code wasn't entirely eevil. In fact in DAG, he was turned because he stopped to help someone (appius) who lay apparently hurt by the side of the road. I'm not saying the vikings were pure goodness, but then again, many (if not most) previous cultures viewed from the lens of today would not be considered "good". I'm not ignoring eric's past, but I don't think it precludes him from being an appropriate partner for sookie. Again, I don't think that ms. harris will have sookie end up with a vampire, but the reason I don't think she will is because from my reading of her quotes, interviews, etc she thinks there is something inherently "wrong" with them. That, I have a problem with, especially since we've seen that humans and other supes in the sookieverse are just as capable of evil. It's her story though and she has the right to write it like she wants. I'm still just hoping that eric (and yes bill) will have a chance to find love and happiness with someone.
bontempstired
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 9:50 pm

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby Team Eric » Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:19 am

I agree bontempstired, he isnt pure evil. Now I think the Vampire part brings out more evil. For instance Bill raping Sookie in the trunk of the car. Not something he would have done when he was just out and about. I HOPE that Eric will be the one she is with, I mean he was pretty huge in the last 6 books and he will be big in the next book. Do I think in the last 3 books they are just going to pull someone out of the hat that hasnt been there all along..no. I think it will be one of the mains. I do think also when Erics maker comes back we will see a very bad side..just as Bill had no control with Lorena I think it will be the same for Eric.
User avatar
Team Eric
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:06 pm

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby BethCullen » Tue Nov 24, 2009 11:08 pm

Ok, I didn't read this entire thread - I got too frustrated - but I read most of it and wanted to add a comment. Sorry if I'm repeating something.

I read the interview comment a few weeks ago, but didn't really process it since it made me pretty upset. Now that I've had time to cool off and read others' thoughts and the comments from CH's site, I feel like I can say something worth while.

Perhaps the comment on its own is unintentionally harsh and we shouldn't take it personally. It seems like it was in a series of comments that had many reasons behind them. So, we should probably calm down about this particular statement or any one particular statement made by an author.

The bigger issue in my mind is the way CH handles press and her own site. It seems like she make entirely too many comments about her series for starters. Don't give some many answers and we'll speculate on the books themselves, not interview comments, which are often unreliable due to context issues. It seems like she says something, pisses people off, tries to explain, gets fed up, and tells everyone to get over it. NOT a great way to deal with things. Even a large number of super vague answers would be better than releasing all these potentially spoilery ones and then ending up insulting your fans with comments about us not thinking or insinuating we're overly obsessed, etc.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised that some people suck at managing their press, but I thought she'd have someone to help her with things like this. I would much rather her say nothing, than say four or five confusing and some what contradictory things.

As for the thoughts she's trying to "throw people off" - It's entirely possible she's doing that, but I really wish she wouldn't. If you've written an interesting story, you don't need to make comments to throw people off, the story will be good and people will read it. And if she just STOPPED doing all this commenting, she wouldn't need to throw anyone off! It seems twisty and deceptive and it's ultimately LYING to your fans. Maybe CH is the "bad" one. :o I just don't think that's the way you should deal with your fans.

Don't get me wrong, I don't hate CH. I just wish she handled herself differently.
User avatar
BethCullen
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 8:23 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby cathrine » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:27 pm

I don't hate her either but really two thing bug me.1.I don't understand how can she write Eric as not an evil guy but than says he is bad.I really don't belive Eric is a bad person/vampire.2.She says she choose who Sookie ends up whit in book 2 and made Eric a larger chratcer because she loved writing him.I know she siad Eric isn't eliminated from beeing ''the one'' but seriously if you say he is an evil guy than you shouldn't have the ES relationship which was growing deeper and deeper in the books.I have a feeling that she doesn'y want Sookie to end up whit a vampire because she thinks she(Sookie) is too good to be whit a one or something like that.Every time whe i re-read the books I'm petty sure ES will end up together but when CH says something like that I start to doubt.Please don't ruen ES it's enough that AB is already ruening them as characters in True Blood.
cathrine
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:23 pm

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby gigi » Fri Nov 27, 2009 6:58 pm

Kogo Shuko wrote:Let's face it: Eric really is a bad guy. He is evil, and he has killed, moreso than Bill. And why? Because he's had hundreds of years more to do it, and to excel at it! I don't for a minute doubt that Eric used to be a ruthless killer, and that he enjoyed the lifestyle.

And let's not forget what he was before he became vampire. Eric had been a viking. I think they're cool, but did you know that they killed off an entire people? The Picts were annihilated by the Vikings. The reason I so chose to learn that tidbit is because the Scottish clan I come from claims to be descended from the Picts (but other clans scoff at this remark). For one people to kill off another people entirely - and on purpose, for this was no killing by disease - that's pretty harsh, cruel, and let's face it... evil.

And while I am most undoubtedly in love with the character of Eric Northman, I can see where she's coming from. Especially since I am choosing to ignore Eric's past. I choose to love the character who comes from a bloodthirsty background - even before he became human! Bill, while still a vampire, has a more... noble... human past, although I suppose the slavery thing sure as hell isn't noble. But basically... Bill didn't go around pillaging. Eric most probably did.

We, the readers, do so choose to ignore Eric's past. But we choose to ignore it so that we can see the Eric in the here and now. And even the present Eric isn't all rainbows and puppies. I do agree with the statement that Eric can't love anyone but himself. He really couldn't. Not until he met Sookie, that is. Sookie has changed him, and it's the changed man that I have come to love. I think there's a lot of change going on in Eric's life, and Sookie is allowing him to become the man he has been underneath the facade. Whether it was a facade or not, I still think he has been a cruel and heartless bastard. And I think he will be again. But if he does something, I have no doubt he will try to earn Sookie's trust and respect once more, and he shall. Because Sookie is what makes him tic now. He needs to feel the emotions she instills upon him.

I have to respectfully disagree with you on some of your opinions.

The real issue here isn't if Eric and Bill are bad or not. If we go to history per se, vikings, as southern men during Civil War, both were warriors, soldiers serving their territories interests. The job of a soldier is to kill the enemy (with another marginal tasks as patrol, guard, etc, but their formal training has the purpose of teach them to kill). From this perspective, right or wrong, they both were killers. No more, no less. But they both were doing what they think were right... even when NOW we (I include myself) think we can judge History and say what they did was wrong. But, if we can justify a southern soldier actions inside the mores and historical context of the Civil War events just because we have to consider he was a christian and had a family; then we have to justify a viking as well considering the mores and historical context period the vikings existed, understanding he had another belief system because christianity didn't even exist, and because he had a family, too.

Going further, if they were both turned into vampires, they aren't human anymore. I'm not going to discuss the vampire predatory and instinct nature here because we read about it enough on the books. Saying that both of them HAVE to "live" dead as vampires is enough. So what's the difference? The extent of time? I can't believe that unique variable could determine which one is the best or the worst because then, to be fair, we have to search for the intentions and motives of their actions. And also we know that PEOPLE (vampires are dead, but still are dead people) are always able to learn, change and grow through time... for better or for worse.
Bill, while still a vampire, has a more... noble... human past, although I suppose the slavery thing sure as hell isn't noble. But basically... Bill didn't go around pillaging. Eric most probably did.
And this is the thought with which I'm more in disagreement. First, because of the arguments I already wrote above. Second, because it's an opinion that isn't based on canon facts (you can't find those facts on any of the SVM books). And, Third, because nobility isn't a exactly a virtue that Bill Comptom has.

Nobility by definition is the quality of being exalted in character, ideals or conduct (or a priviledge class holding hereditary titles, that neither applies here). I can't say Bill was a noble person as human because isn't a fact, and can't say he is noble as a vampire, because he is the only one of both (I mean between Eric and him) that has commited murders beyond his vampire predatory nature. He murdered the Rattrays and Sookie's great uncle Barlett, not even in self defense or defending her, but just for revenge (and vengeance isn't a very noble purpose because it is wilful, calculated and deliberate in itself). As calculated and deliberated as was his purpose of return to Bon Temps to seduce her for the Queen's benefit. The only action I could think of him as noble was giving his money to the Bellefleurs, but it was blured by the fact that he didn't care about Sookie's home and financial needs even when he almost lived with her, used all her house utilities and "love" her (well, that's was Sookie's complaint, right?).
I do agree with the statement that Eric can't love anyone but himself. He really couldn't.

I can't disagree with you more on this, too. As Bill, he also had a family (mother, father, brother, wife and children) and told Sookie about his lost of them when he was turned into a vampire helping what he thought was a hurt man on the road (which is a very weird behavior for a man that, like you think, enjoyed killing...). Love is a very subjective construct and feeling. There are different kinds of love (eros, agape, philial, fraternal, etc), and not experience one kind doesn't excludes been able to feel another. Also the individual perception of what we know as "romantic" love is determined by many other variables as history periods and even Hollywood movies.

IMO,the real issue here is DeeDee's question about CH attitude. I was reading on trueblood.net the article about the last interview of CH with ABC News ( http://truebloodnet.com/charlaine-harri ... -abc-news/ ) and found this:
One question that was sent in to Charlaine by a reader for the interview was regarding a statement that Charlaine once made that she didn’t understand why so many fans love Eric so much? The reader wanted clarification to this statement since in her eyes she felt that Charlaine had written the Eric character as always being there for Sookie, fulfilling her needs, being truthful and being emotionally connected to Sookie.

“I’m not denying that’s one side of Eric, but he’s also a ruthless killer and I think some of my readers tend to forget that in their enthusiasm for his sexier habits.”

She insists (the low blow again...) that in our enthusiams for his sexier habits some of us forget that Eric is a ruthless killer?? It seems she forgot to add that even Sookie is a killer and an accomplice on several murders. Wasn't she ruthless when Bill murdered his great uncle? She said to him she was glad he was dead and her only worry was thinking dating him was like dating the Godfather but she was sure he'd never hurt her... ????!! (Isn't she the only killer from the 3 known telepaths on the books? lol) ALL Sups, vampires, werewolves, fairies, shifters and Britlingens had kill on the books. So, what happens to CH with Eric and his fans now? Killing is bad, but ALL are killers, so why are now Eric the one and only bad ruthless killer worth to mention? If Bill fans are always asking if they are going to have hot and steamy sex on her next book (which in fact was also a question on the interview) why are Eric's fans the only ones airheads enough to forget how BAD is killing and how ruthless Eric is (of course because in her opinion we are now just a bunch of nympho-eric-maniacs?)

Anyway, I will be eternally grateful if any of you, please, enlight me with the information about which book, chapter, page and paragraph tells about an Eric's ruthless murder (not a self defense kill, or a kill defending his queen) since he met Sookie. Because, honestly, I read and re-read all 9 books, and can't find one.

I'm really getting very, very tired with her attitude...
Image

‘Oh, Billy…This paranoia, it’s really quite unbecoming. Has she, uh…mentioned me?’
User avatar
gigi
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:41 pm

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby cathrine » Fri Nov 27, 2009 7:18 pm

I agree whit you.I think taht whit this comment CH disrespected her fans.So th eonly reason we buy and we read those books or because of Eric's sexiness?CH are you kidding me!I'm sorry but if you think that we like Eric because he is sexy and we love ES just because of the sex you're on the wrong road.Eric may be a ruthless killer as she says he is but in all the 9 books he never killed someone ruthllesly.ofcourse that could change in the 10th book so that CH could make us see how ''evil and bad'' Eric really is.So what she thinks that because of his past he isn't worthy beeing whit Sookie.Sookie isn't a saing either she may have killed people in self defense but she made many mistakes too.That's just so stupid.
cathrine
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:23 pm

Re: Does Charlaine still like Eric?

Postby Cougar4Eric » Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:33 pm

Well, many of you have said the things I've been thinking. I really want to believe that CH is just trying to control the Eric fan's belief that Eric is a shoe in. I really, REALLY hope that CH isn't being influenced by AB.

I really hate what AB has done to CH's story. I'm an Eric fan until the end :viking: NOT DOUBT!!
I don't hate Bill, I just want my vamps to be alpha males. Eric is, Bill isn't.

Now, here is my plea to CH, PLEASE don't let outside influences direct YOUR story, YOUR characters. There is a reason we read the books and continue to be loyal fans, THE STORY!! :jumpclap: :jumpclap: If You stay true to your vision we will stay true to you. Please CH, don't mess with us, and DON'T let us down. It was obvious from book one that you liked/loved Eric, don't throw him aside for the wrong reasons.

I'll step off the soapbox now.
Cougar
User avatar
Cougar4Eric
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:57 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Eric Northman

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron